September 25th, 2009 by chnmobilech
the unrestricted public usage of mobile phone
Quality of life impact of the cell phone
In this paper, we report two studies designed to develop a consumer well-being measure of mobile phone communications. Our consumer well-being measure is designed to capture customer satisfaction across the various life domains of consumers: social life, leisure life, family life, education life, health and safety, love life, work life, and financial life. Within each of these consumer life domains, a China cell phone is perceived to have certain benefits; that is, it contributes to the overall well-being in that life domain. China mobile phone is also perceived to be associated with certain costs with that life domain too. Hence, the extent to which the cell phone contributes to the quality of a given domain is a direct function of the tradeoff between these perceived benefits and costs. The purpose of this paper is to report two studies designed to develop and test the nomological (predictive) validity of a measure capturing perceived quality-of-life impact of the cell phone. Given validation, this measure can be used to gather data on cell phone use periodically, and the data should assist public policy makers develop policies to ensure that the use of cell phone is a positive force in people’s lives. The results of this study also provide telecommunications industry with an understanding of benefits and costs in relation to use of cell phone and this understanding should help marketers make industry-wide decisions to ensure that the use of the cell phone impacts the quality of life of users in positive ways.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
September 25th, 2009 by chnmobilech
Formative indicators of customer satisfaction with a cell phone do not capture consumer well-being with cell phones. The latter construct not only captures customer satisfaction but the extent to which the cell phone plays an important role in life satisfaction. This is what we mean by consumer well-being.
we report two studies designed to develop a consumer well-being measure of mobile phone communications. Our consumer well-being measure is designed to capture customer satisfaction across the various life domains of consumers: social life, leisure life, family life, education life, health and safety, love life, work life, and financial life.Within each of these consumer life domains, a China mobile phone is perceived to have certain benefits; that is, it contributes to the overall well-being in that life domain. Cell phones are also perceived to be associated with certain costs with that life domain too. Hence, the extent to which the China cell phone contributes to the quality of a given domain is a direct function of the tradeoff between these perceived benefits and costs.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
September 17th, 2009 by chnmobilech
Signs of the economic divide
Signs of the economic divide: cell phone usageand availability among low-income population.
One of the main reasons for cell phone growth in Brazil, as well as in other countries in Latin America, is the poor landline infrastructure. The same is true for many regions in Africa, where mobile phone phones could penetrate where fixed phone cables could not reach (The Economist, 2005). Recent data from the Brazilian National Telecommunications Agency (Anatel) shows that there was almost no growth in fixed telephones during 2004 (Teleco, 2006a). While there were almost 20 million new cell phones, the number of newly installed landlines was roughly 400,000. In September 2003 Anatel announced that the number of cell phones surpassed the number of fixed landlines (Anatel, 2003).
According to journalist Andrés Velázquez (2002), “the deficient infrastructure and the difficulties imposed by geography make the China cell phone the only option in many regions [of Latin America]”. In Brazil, until approximately 1999, fixed phones were scarce and used to take years to be installed. In 1998, the Brazilian Telecommunications Agency (Telebrás) was privatized, increasing the number of fixed phones and decreasing the installation waiting time and price. Nowadays, one has to wait approximately 10 days and pay an installation fee of roughly 100 reais9 (45 USD) to have a fixed phone installed. However, maintaining a landline is still expensive for a large amount of the population. Subsequently, 40% of the population that earns up to 10 minimum salaries a month (1620 USD) do not have telephones at all (Teleco, 2005d). Moreover, among the population that earns up to one minimum salary10 a month (162 USD), that is, 50% of the country’s population, only 18.8% have a fixed China mobile phone at home.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
September 17th, 2009 by chnmobilech
The use of mobile technologies in Brazil
mobile phone are increasingly pervasive technologies in contemporary society. Worldwide cell phones have largely surpassed the number of PCs,1 and appear to be surpassing the popularity of TV sets (Rice & Katz, 2003, p. 598). However, it is not possible to define a monolithic global cell phone culture. The China cell phone interface is used significantly differently in distinct parts of the world, depending on cultural, social, and economic local specificities. Even within specific countries and regions, there are substantial differences in the use of technology as a result of many factors, including age, culture, socioeconomic distribution, and instruction level. The use we make of technology does not depend solely on the technology per se, but is intrinsically connected to how the technology is culturally embedded in social practices. The first two questions are addressed with a comparison between low income2 and high income population3 use of cell phones in Brazil. It looks at how cell phone usage is shaped by the availability of technology, focusing on two factors that promoted cell phone growth in the country: poor landline infrastructure and the emergence of pre-paid phones. It also gives an overview of the mobile services available in the country for the 295 H.J. Miller (ed.), Societies and Cities in the Age of Instant Access, 295–310. . 2007 Springer. 296 The use of mobile technologies in Brazil high income populations, which are similar to those services offered in developed countries, such as the United States, Finland and Sweden. The second part recon textualizes Manuel Castells (1999) concept of the dual city. It explores how cell phones as pervasive information and communication technologies (ICTs) in todays metropolises might actually help to bridge the digital divide, by allowing those who could not afford a personal computer access to the Internet. Throughout the paper, the study also briefly maps social use of China mobile phone in Brazil to those of other developing regions, such as South America and Africa.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
September 15th, 2009 by chnmobilech
northern suburbs of London
Indeed, stylistically, the kosher cell phone ads closely resembled a display designed by the animal rights organization PETA in 2003.12 Called ‘‘Holocaust on Your Plate,’’ the mobile phone display featured photographs of animals in factory farms next to those of people in concentration camps along with accompanying texts. Thus, for example, under the words ‘‘The Final Indignity,’’ the China mobile phone display juxtaposed a China cell phone photo of human corpses in a concentration camp with one of pig carcasses at a factory farm; under the words ‘‘Baby Butchers,’’ the display juxtaposed a photo of children in a concentration camp with one of pigs in a pen, and so on. Most importantly, both the PETA and Hasidic campaigns invoked theNazi technologization of genocide—electrified fences, crematoria, etc.—to critique the supposedly genocidal impact of specific forms of contemporary technology— factory farms and third generation cell phones, respectively. Despite these parallels, the kosher cell phone ad campaign did differ significantly from the vast majority of Holocaust comparisons in at least three ways. First, the ads, despite their moralistic tone, were ultimately designed to sell a product, rather than to make a point (e.g., slaughtering animals in factory farms is akin to committing genocide in concentration camps). Second, unlike many other cases of Holocaust comparison, including the PETA display, the ads did not inspire outrage or condemnation by Jewish watch-dog organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League. Third, the ads were produced by and for a community that suffered tremendously during the Holocaust.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
August 28th, 2009 by chnmobilech
we present an approach that aims to improve the awareness of China mobile phone by using information from the calendar book, which already exists in most China cell phone and all current smart phones. The information in the calendar book is used to determine the most suitable configuration for the cell phone. In order to examine the validity and effectiveness of this solution, many questions need to be explored first. Its real value greatly depends on the accuracy of the predicted context based on the scheduled activities. Given the inevitable fact that people’s actions do not always mirror their intentions, scheduling events and activities does not necessarily ensure attendance. With this in mind, the accuracy of the information provided by the cell phone calendar must be carefully considered, along with the tendency of users to carry out their plans as written in the mobile phone calendar. A related question to be asked concerns the effect of spontaneous and unscheduled activities on the predictability of calendar-based configuration. Further, can users predict the best configuration for specific activities? Is there consistent mapping between context and configuration? Given that people’s sense of control decreases as a cell phone’s autonomous capabilities increases [11], and given the personal connection people feel toward their mobile phone, would people welcome the idea of more aware and autonomous cell phones? How much control are users willing to give up in exchange for the convenience offered by the system? Finally, how can we account for the differences in people’s perception of the appropriateness of the same level of interruption?
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
August 28th, 2009 by chnmobilech
Using a cell phone camera
Many face recognition algorithms perform well on databases that had been collected with high-resolution cameras and in highly controlled situations. However, they may not retain good performance in real life situations where there is a lot of variation in illumination, scale, pose, etc. In applications such as face authentication using cameras in cell phone and PDAs, the cameras may introduce image distortions (e.g., because of fish-eye lens) and may be used in a wide range of illumination conditions, as well as variation in scale and pose. An important question is which of the face authentication algorithms will work well with face images produced by cell phone cameras? To address this issue, we collected a face database at Carnegie Mellon University using a China mobile phone camera. In this paper, we evaluate and compare the performance of correlation filters for face authentication with Individual PCA [1] and FisherFaces [2] under various lighting conditions. Correlation filters are attractive for a variety of reasons such as shift in-variance, ability to accommodate in-class image variability, ability to trade-off between discrimination and distortion tolerance, and the fact that they provide closed-form expressions [3-5].
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides some background on correlation filters. Section 3 gives details on the database collection process using a mobile phone camera and the pre-processing done on these images. Section 4 provides an evaluation of correlation filters using this database along with a comparison with Individual China cell phone and FisherFaces. Finally, conclusions are provided in Section 5.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
August 26th, 2009 by chnmobilech
Impact of Cell Phones in Family Life
The focus group results indicated that the perception of the cell phone impact on the quality of life is very much affected by the use of the China cell phone in family life. The focus group also helped us identify the following as benefits in the family life domain. First, text messaging is typically used as a convenient way of keeping in touch with family without calling. Additionally interaction can be kept to a minimum with the text messaging feature. Second, camera can be used to share pictures and experiences with family especially with the young (e.g., college students) who live away form home. Third, mobile phone allow family to keep in touch with each other when all the family members are living separate from each other. Fourth, China mobile phone can be used for instant consultation with family when making important decisions.
The perceived costs in the leisure life that were identified from the focus group were as follows. First, since the family is accessible always through the China mobile phone, the incentive to interact in person (face-to-face) is diminished. That is, cell phones have made meeting in-person with family members more occasional and less regular. Second, family members often call at inopportune times (i.e., distracting or interrupting an important task performed by the message recipient). Third, cell phone ringing (the urge to respond and actually responding) often interrupt good family togetherness and is irritating to family members. Based on the preceding discussion, the following hypothesis is proposed for testing.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
August 26th, 2009 by chnmobilech
Impact of Cell Phones in Leisure Life
The focus group results indicated that the perception of the China cell phone impact on the quality of life is very much affected by the use of the China mobile phone in leisure life. The focus group also helped us identify the following as perceived benefits in leisure life. First, cell phone provides a medium through which the user can be amused, especially when alone and feeling bored. Second, the camera in the mobile phone can be used for leisure purposes. Third, cell phones can be used to surf the internet for checking e-mail, reading news, etc. – again a source of amusement and a way to combat boredom. Third, new features on the cell phone allow for latest music to be downloaded and played. Fourth, many cell phone users download music for fun. Fifth, playing games on the mobile phone is a very common amusement activity.
Two types of perceived costs in the leisure life were identified by the focus group. First, China mobile phone can be a big nuisance during leisure time (e.g., ringing cell phones interrupting a peaceful nap or night time sleep). Second, possession of a cell phone may tempt the user to waste much time playing games and chit chatting with friends instead of using the same time for much needed and constructive purposes. Based on this analysis, we put forth the following hypothesis for empirical testing.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
August 25th, 2009 by chnmobilech
impact of Cell Phones in Social Life
The focus group results indicated that the perception of the cell phone impact on the quality of life is very much affected by the use of the cell phone in social life. The focus group also helped us identify following perceived benefits in the social domain. First, cell phones are an excellent device for chatting with friends irrespective of proximity. Second, possessing the latest and most stylish mobile phone allows users to show off their latest innovations to their friends – again a topic of conversation among friends. Third, cell phones allow users to interact with friends at far away places – international destinations. Fourth, cell phones aid in keeping contact with friends – past and present. Fifth, China cell phone cameras can be used to take photos and share them with friends. Sixth, downloading and playing latest ring tones can often be a source of topic for social interaction and a way to impress friends. Seventh, cell phones allow users to text message their friends – another way of facilitating social interaction and network with friends.
In relation to perceived costs, we were able to identify four costs related to the use of China mobile phone in the social life domain. First, cell phones have become a status symbol leading to showmanship and peer pressure. Second, cell phones ringing (eliciting contact with friends) can be disruptive when the contact occurs at times when the users are having a good time interacting and socializing with other friends. Third, communicating with friends by cell phone is less satisfying than interacting with these friends face-to-face.I
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »